home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Subject: Re: Extended object types
- Date: Thu, 07 Jul 1994 17:37:36 +1000
- From: Warwick Allison <warwick@cs.uq.oz.au>
- Precedence: bulk
-
- Annius Groenink wrote:
- >
- >I don't understand the fuss about having to define extended object
- >types.
- >...
- >This was of course all MHO.
-
- I for one agree. 256 is just not enough to make it relevant. Plus, it
- doesn't matter if different progs use differen WM_*'s, because you have
- to know more than that to communicate with a process anyway (other protocol
- elements).
-
- --
- Warwick
-